Envoy discovers its various dynamic resources via the filesystem or by querying
one or more management servers. Collectively, these discovery services and their
corresponding APIs are referred to as xDS. Resources are requested via
subscriptions, by specifying a filesystem path to watch, initiating gRPC
streams or polling a REST-JSON URL. The latter two methods involve sending
requests with a
DiscoveryRequest
proto payload. Resources are delivered in a
DiscoveryResponse
proto payload in all methods. We discuss each type of subscription below.
The simplest approach to delivering dynamic configuration is to place it at a
well known path specified in the
ConfigSource
.
Envoy will use inotify
(kqueue
on Mac OS X) to monitor the file for changes
and parse the DiscoveryResponse
proto in the file on update. Binary
protobufs, JSON, YAML and proto text are supported formats for the
DiscoveryResponse
.
There is no mechanism available for filesystem subscriptions to ACK/NACK updates beyond stats counters and logs. The last valid configuration for an xDS API will continue to apply if an configuration update rejection occurs.
A gRPC
ApiConfigSource
can be specified independently for each xDS API, pointing at an upstream
cluster corresponding to a management server. This will initiate an independent
bidirectional gRPC stream for each xDS resource type, potentially to distinct
management servers. API delivery is eventually consistent. See
ADS below for situations in which explicit
control of sequencing is required.
Each xDS API is concerned with resources of a given type. There is a 1:1 correspondence between an xDS API and a resource type. That is:
- LDS:
envoy.api.v2.Listener
- RDS:
envoy.api.v2.RouteConfiguration
- CDS:
envoy.api.v2.Cluster
- EDS:
envoy.api.v2.ClusterLoadAssignment
The concept of type
URLs appears
below, and takes the form type.googleapis.com/<resource type>
, e.g.
type.googleapis.com/envoy.api.v2.Cluster
for CDS. In various requests from
Envoy and responses by the management server, the resource type URL is stated.
Each stream begins with a DiscoveryRequest
from Envoy, specifying the list of
resources to subscribe to, the type URL corresponding to the subscribed
resources, the node identifier and an empty version_info
. An example EDS request
might be:
version_info:
node: { id: envoy }
resource_names:
- foo
- bar
type_url: type.googleapis.com/envoy.api.v2.ClusterLoadAssignment
response_nonce:
The management server may reply either immediately or when the requested
resources are available with a DiscoveryResponse
, e.g.:
version_info: X
resources:
- foo ClusterLoadAssignment proto encoding
- bar ClusterLoadAssignment proto encoding
type_url: type.googleapis.com/envoy.api.v2.ClusterLoadAssignment
nonce: A
After processing the DiscoveryResponse
, Envoy will send a new request on the
stream, specifying the last version successfully applied and the nonce provided
by the management server. If the update was successfully applied, the
version_info
will be X, as indicated in the sequence diagram:
In this sequence diagram, and below, the following format is used to abbreviate messages:
DiscoveryRequest
: (V=version_info
,R=resource_names
,N=response_nonce
,T=type_url
)DiscoveryResponse
: (V=version_info
,R=resources
,N=nonce
,T=type_url
)
The version provides Envoy and the management server a shared notion of the
currently applied configuration, as well as a mechanism to ACK/NACK
configuration updates. If Envoy had instead rejected configuration update X,
it would reply with
error_detail
populated and its previous version, which in this case was the empty
initial version. The error_detail has more details around the exact error message
populated in the message field:
Later, an API update may succeed at a new version Y:
Each stream has its own notion of versioning, there is no shared versioning
across resource types. When ADS is not used, even each resource of a given
resource type may have a
distinct version, since the Envoy API allows distinct EDS/RDS resources to point
at different ConfigSource
s.
The management server should only send updates to the Envoy client when the
resources in the DiscoveryResponse
have changed. Envoy replies to any
DiscoveryResponse
with a DiscoveryRequest
containing the ACK/NACK
immediately after it has been either accepted or rejected. If the management
server provides the same set of resources rather than waiting for a change to
occur, it will cause Envoy and the management server to spin and have a severe
performance impact.
Within a stream, new DiscoveryRequest
s supersede any prior DiscoveryRequest
s
having the same resource type. This means that the management server only needs
to respond to the latest DiscoveryRequest
on each stream for any given resource
type.
The resource_names
specified in the DiscoveryRequest
are a hint. Some
resource types, e.g. Cluster
s and Listener
s will specify an empty
resource_names
list, since Envoy is interested in learning about all the
Cluster
s (CDS) and Listener
s (LDS) that the management server(s) know about
corresponding to its node identification. Other resource types, e.g.
RouteConfiguration
s (RDS) and ClusterLoadAssignment
s (EDS), follow from
earlier CDS/LDS updates and Envoy is able to explicitly enumerate these
resources.
LDS/CDS resource hints will always be empty and it is expected that the
management server will provide the complete state of the LDS/CDS resources in
each response. An absent Listener
or Cluster
will be deleted.
For EDS/RDS, the management server does not need to supply every requested
resource and may also supply additional, unrequested resources, resource_names
is only a hint. Envoy will silently ignore any superfluous resources. When a
requested resource is missing in a RDS or EDS update, Envoy will retain the last
known value for this resource. The management server may be able to infer all
the required EDS/RDS resources from the node
identification in the
DiscoveryRequest
, in which case this hint may be discarded. An empty EDS/RDS
DiscoveryResponse
is effectively a nop from the perspective of the respective
resources in the Envoy.
When a Listener
or Cluster
is deleted, its corresponding EDS and RDS
resources are also deleted inside the Envoy instance. In order for EDS resources
to be known or tracked by Envoy, there must exist an applied Cluster
definition (e.g. sourced via CDS). A similar relationship exists between RDS and
Listeners
(e.g. sourced via LDS).
For EDS/RDS, Envoy may either generate a distinct stream for each resource of a
given type (e.g. if each ConfigSource
has its own distinct upstream cluster
for a management server), or may combine together multiple resource requests for
a given resource type when they are destined for the same management server.
This is left to implementation specifics, management servers should be capable
of handling one or more resource_names
for a given resource type in each
request. Both sequence diagrams below are valid for fetching two EDS resources
{foo, bar}
:
As discussed above, Envoy may update the list of resource_names
it presents to
the management server in each DiscoveryRequest
that ACK/NACKs a specific
DiscoveryResponse
. In addition, Envoy may later issue additional
DiscoveryRequest
s at a given version_info
to update the management server
with new resource hints. For example, if Envoy is at EDS version X and knows
only about cluster foo
, but then receives a CDS update and learns about bar
in addition, it may issue an additional DiscoveryRequest
for X with
{foo,bar}
as resource_names
.
There is a race condition that may arise here; if after a resource hint update
is issued by Envoy at X, but before the management server processes the
update it replies with a new version Y, the resource hint update may be
interpreted as a rejection of Y by presenting an X version_info
. To
avoid this, the management server provides a nonce
that Envoy uses to indicate
the specific DiscoveryResponse
each DiscoveryRequest
corresponds to:
The management server should not send a DiscoveryResponse
for any
DiscoveryRequest
that has a stale nonce. A nonce becomes stale following a
newer nonce being presented to Envoy in a DiscoveryResponse
. A management
server does not need to send an update until it determines a new version is
available. Earlier requests at a version then also become stale. It may process
multiple DiscoveryRequests
at a version until a new version is ready.
An implication of the above resource update sequencing is that Envoy does not
expect a DiscoveryResponse
for every DiscoveryRequest
it issues.
Since Envoy's xDS APIs are eventually consistent, traffic may drop briefly
during updates. For example, if only cluster X is known via CDS/EDS,
a RouteConfiguration
references cluster X
and is then adjusted to cluster Y just before the CDS/EDS update
providing Y, traffic will be blackholed until Y is known about by the
Envoy instance.
For some applications, a temporary drop of traffic is acceptable, retries at the client or by other Envoy sidecars will hide this drop. For other scenarios where drop can't be tolerated, traffic drop could have been avoided by providing a CDS/EDS update with both X and Y, then the RDS update repointing from X to Y and then a CDS/EDS update dropping X.
In general, to avoid traffic drop, sequencing of updates should follow a
make before break
model, wherein
- CDS updates (if any) must always be pushed first.
- EDS updates (if any) must arrive after CDS updates for the respective clusters.
- LDS updates must arrive after corresponding CDS/EDS updates.
- RDS updates related to the newly added listeners must arrive in the end.
- Stale CDS clusters and related EDS endpoints (ones no longer being referenced) can then be removed.
xDS updates can be pushed independently if no new clusters/routes/listeners are added or if it's acceptable to temporarily drop traffic during updates. Note that in case of LDS updates, the listeners will be warmed before they receive traffic, i.e. the dependent routes are fetched through RDS if configured. On the other hand, clusters are not warmed when adding/removing/updating clusters. Similarly, routes are not warmed -- i.e., the management plane must ensure that clusters referenced by a route are in place, before pushing the updates for a rotue.
It's challenging to provide the above guarantees on sequencing to avoid traffic
drop when management servers are distributed. ADS allow a single management
server, via a single gRPC stream, to deliver all API updates. This provides the
ability to carefully sequence updates to avoid traffic drop. With ADS, a single
stream is used with multiple independent DiscoveryRequest
/DiscoveryResponse
sequences multiplexed via the type URL. For any given type URL, the above
sequencing of DiscoveryRequest
and DiscoveryResponse
messages applies. An
example update sequence might look like:
A single ADS stream is available per Envoy instance.
An example minimal bootstrap.yaml
fragment for ADS configuration is:
node:
id: <node identifier>
dynamic_resources:
cds_config: {ads: {}}
lds_config: {ads: {}}
ads_config:
api_type: GRPC
cluster_name: [ads_cluster]
static_resources:
clusters:
- name: ads_cluster
connect_timeout: { seconds: 5 }
type: STATIC
hosts:
- socket_address:
address: <ADS management server IP address>
port_value: <ADS management server port>
lb_policy: ROUND_ROBIN
http2_protocol_options: {}
admin:
...
Synchronous (long) polling via REST endpoints is also available for the xDS
singleton APIs. The above sequencing of messages is similar, except no
persistent stream is maintained to the management server. It is expected that
there is only a single outstanding request at any point in time, and as a result
the response nonce is optional in REST-JSON. The JSON canonical transform of
proto3 is used
to encode DiscoveryRequest
and DiscoveryResponse
messages. ADS is not
available for REST-JSON polling.
When the poll period is set to a small value, with the intention of long
polling, then there is also a requirement to avoid sending a DiscoveryResponse
unless a change to the underlying resources has
occurred.