Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Functional test suit amendment to address RM and LM #1424

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

msvinaykumar
Copy link
Contributor

@msvinaykumar msvinaykumar commented Dec 16, 2024

Description

Functional test suite amendment to address RM and LM .
List_recommendations is called using flag rm=true from remote monitoring test cases.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Docs update
  • Breaking change (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
  • Requires DB changes

How has this been tested?

Please describe the tests that were run to verify your changes and steps to reproduce. Please specify any test configuration required.

  • New Test X
  • Functional testsuite

Test Configuration

  • Kubernetes clusters tested on:

Checklist 🎯

  • Followed coding guidelines
  • Comments added
  • Dependent changes merged
  • Documentation updated
  • Tests added or updated

Additional information

Include any additional information such as links, test results, screenshots here

@msvinaykumar msvinaykumar added the API Requires API Changes label Dec 16, 2024
@msvinaykumar msvinaykumar added this to the Kruize 0.3 Release milestone Dec 16, 2024
@msvinaykumar msvinaykumar self-assigned this Dec 16, 2024
@@ -122,7 +124,7 @@ def main(argv):
experiment_name = None
latest = "false"
interval_end_time = None
response = list_recommendations(experiment_name, latest, interval_end_time)
response = list_recommendations(experiment_name, latest, interval_end_time, rm=True)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@msvinaykumar - This change should be made in the remote monitoring fault tolerant test.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Where is this change done? I still see rm=True in local monitoring fault tolerant test.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change is necessary for Fault Tolerance. Are you suggesting removing it from this PR and including it in the Fault Tolerance PR instead? Or is this change not required at all?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have fault tolerant test in both local monitoring and remote monitoring. This change I think is applicable only for remote monitoring fault tolerant test.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, thank you. I removed this change, but the file was still checked in due to a formatting issue.

@msvinaykumar msvinaykumar force-pushed the cft-7-TestForConncurrentLMRM branch from af0b117 to 595c30a Compare December 17, 2024 08:03
@chandrams
Copy link
Contributor

@msvinaykumar - PR check has failed, can you take a look.

@msvinaykumar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@msvinaykumar - PR check has failed, can you take a look.

done

@dinogun
Copy link
Contributor

dinogun commented Dec 17, 2024

@msvinaykumar Please rebase this PR

@msvinaykumar msvinaykumar force-pushed the cft-7-TestForConncurrentLMRM branch from 487b633 to 65602f7 Compare December 18, 2024 02:55
@msvinaykumar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@msvinaykumar Please rebase this PR

done

Signed-off-by: msvinaykumar <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@chandrams chandrams left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@chandrams chandrams merged commit 90841a1 into kruize:mvp_demo Dec 18, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API Requires API Changes
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants