Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Time Range Filter for Bulk API #1369

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 15, 2024

Conversation

khansaad
Copy link
Contributor

@khansaad khansaad commented Nov 13, 2024

Description

This PR adds the feature to get the bulk API result within a specified duration i.e. start and end time.

Note: This is on top of 1358 which needs to be merged first.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Docs update
  • Breaking change (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)
  • Requires DB changes

How has this been tested?

Please describe the tests that were run to verify your changes and steps to reproduce. Please specify any test configuration required.

  • New Test X
  • Functional testsuite

Test Configuration

  • Kubernetes clusters tested on: Minkube and Openshift

Checklist 🎯

  • Followed coding guidelines
  • Comments added
  • Dependent changes merged
  • Documentation updated
  • Tests added or updated

Additional information

Include any additional information such as links, test results, screenshots here

@khansaad khansaad added enhancement New feature or request remote_monitoring labels Nov 13, 2024
@khansaad khansaad added this to the Kruize 0.2 Release milestone Nov 13, 2024
@khansaad khansaad self-assigned this Nov 13, 2024
@@ -144,6 +144,10 @@ public void addDataSourcesFromConfigFile(String configFileName) {
DataSourceInfo dataSourceInfo = new ExperimentDBService().loadDataSourceFromDBByName(name);
if (null != dataSourceInfo) {
LOGGER.error("Datasource: {} already exists!", name);
// add the auth details to local object
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change related to PR ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, this was pulled from #1358 . It needs to be merged first.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@msvinaykumar To avoid confusion, I have removed this change from this PR now. This can be merged now, no dependency on #1358 now.

@dinogun
Copy link
Contributor

dinogun commented Nov 14, 2024

@khansaad Please resolve the conflicts

Signed-off-by: Saad Khan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Saad Khan <[email protected]>
@khansaad
Copy link
Contributor Author

@khansaad Please resolve the conflicts

Done

@dinogun
Copy link
Contributor

dinogun commented Nov 15, 2024

@khansaad This needs an example to be added in the Documentation

design/BulkAPI.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
design/BulkAPI.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
design/BulkAPI.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
design/BulkAPI.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@dinogun dinogun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dinogun dinogun merged commit 6143696 into kruize:mvp_demo Nov 15, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request remote_monitoring
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants