mirror of https://github.com/jkjoy/hugoblog.git
71 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
71 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
|
+++
|
|||
|
title = 'Fujinon XF18mm F1.4 R LM WR Review'
|
|||
|
categories = ["gears"]
|
|||
|
tags = ["fujifilm"]
|
|||
|
date = 2023-10-25T09:34:23+08:00
|
|||
|
cover = 'https://static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/e6zsd2fgagf698b4.jpg'
|
|||
|
+++
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![富士 XF18mmF1.4 R LM WR](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/e6zsd2fgagf698b4.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Actually, I received this lens before the XF56 Mark II, but I didn’t use it much and didn’t take many sample photos. I always felt that this lens had greater potential, so I took it out last weekend and took some shots. However, I realized that it was just the same as before, and I ended up with only a few photos for this article.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I may have different preferences compared to some Fuji users when it comes to lenses. Here are a few requirements I have:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- It must have an aperture ring.
|
|||
|
- The lens body must be made of metal.
|
|||
|
- I prefer a large aperture with image stabilization, so it should have decent low-light capabilities.
|
|||
|
- The acceptable weight should be around one pound.
|
|||
|
- I don’t have high demands for focusing speed and image quality. As long as it is good enough to share on my blog, it’s sufficient.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I’m not a gearhead, so I won’t go into analyzing the technical specifications. This lens is said to have the best image quality among the f/1.4 lineup and is also the most expensive. It is made in Japan and has a great build quality.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/hey0l89rxxisj40g.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This lens comes with a metal square lens hood, but it’s a bit expensive at over $400, so I haven’t purchased it yet. Despite being a wide-angle lens, it still has good bokeh capabilities due to its large aperture.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## Pros
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- Solid metal construction with excellent build quality.
|
|||
|
- Large aperture for outstanding image quality.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## Cons
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- The included plastic lens hood is unattractive, and the metal square lens hood is expensive.
|
|||
|
- The 18mm focal length may not be wide enough for some users.
|
|||
|
- The aperture ring may feel a bit loose.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## Sample photos
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/wc2rn0cq7z6cajzv.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/xbjd2ydtkob0beu7.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/3l1v4byy79zxwdg7.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/v44bq6lrcjcz7stf.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/n9oij4zqd6fwxrsv.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/rkcrwpm8ti2ydle4.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/y2uiyc53b4nr74kq.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/57h4670c99zi3x8k.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/kdazrvy1uon27ua8.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![This handheld shot is already full of noise.](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/09/2e2x0glommu7gp38.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/08/me138diy97pskjzt.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/08/hiei62sxtmsadzpr.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/08/m76hhxxri8zz1a38.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
![](//static.fatesinger.com/2023/08/r95og36a35mweu95.jpg)
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## Conclusion
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
For now, it’s working pretty well.
|