We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pub struct Event { pub package_id: ObjectId, pub module: Identifier,
pub struct Event { pub package_id: ObjectID, pub transaction_module: Identifier,
iota repo has transaction_ as name, is this fine or do we want to align?
transaction_
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There are even more inconsistencies
pub struct GasPayment { pub objects: Vec<ObjectReference>, pub owner: Address, #[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", serde(with = "crate::_serde::ReadableDisplay"))] #[cfg_attr(feature = "schemars", schemars(with = "crate::_schemars::U64"))] pub price: u64, #[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", serde(with = "crate::_serde::ReadableDisplay"))] #[cfg_attr(feature = "schemars", schemars(with = "crate::_schemars::U64"))] pub budget: u64, }
iota repo:
pub struct GasData { pub payment: Vec<ObjectRef>, pub owner: IotaAddress, pub price: u64, pub budget: u64, }
pub struct Transaction { pub kind: TransactionKind, pub sender: Address, pub gas_payment: GasPayment, pub expiration: TransactionExpiration, }
pub struct TransactionDataV1 { pub kind: TransactionKind, pub sender: IotaAddress, pub gas_data: GasData, pub expiration: TransactionExpiration, }
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
iota repo has
transaction_
as name, is this fine or do we want to align?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: