Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

some errors in isolated module sol2 fastq conversion #26

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 20, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

some errors in isolated module sol2 fastq conversion #26

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 20, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Hi, I think this issue may be related to the one I have risen few minutes ago. 
I isolated the conversion process between solexa and fastq files as I may need 
to use it separately from  the alignment pipelines. Seems to me that the input 
and the parameters are matching. Also the scripts have always the same 
location, the output folder as well.

Sorry for the naive question, if this is the case.


Fede

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 20 Sep 2011 at 6:32

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

....Furthermore, if I create FROM SCRATCH the same workflow it actually works! 
SO, I s there something kinda hidden in the "pieces" of pipeline you developed? 
may it be related to the other issue I have reported (i.e. #25) when I had to 
remove a "piece" of the pipeline (as my simulated data were already in fastq)?

I attach the anonymous pipe I have created from scratch.

Federica

Original comment by [email protected] on 21 Sep 2011 at 10:08

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

There is nothing hidden - these workflows are the same and are both working for 
me on fgene1. Is there anything reported in the output or error streams? 

Original comment by [email protected] on 22 Sep 2011 at 8:02

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

No there was anything reported ...I will try the same run on fgene1

Original comment by [email protected] on 22 Sep 2011 at 8:13

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I noticed that in your data source you are using the 150k.txt files and in the 
data sink you are naming the outputs 1k.fastq. Just wanted to make sure you you 
know that this workflow is outputting 150k.fastq files.

Original comment by [email protected] on 26 Sep 2011 at 9:37

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant