Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Playhouse not rendered in park #4816

Closed
BertMule opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Playhouse not rendered in park #4816

BertMule opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@BertMule
Copy link

Here is an example of inconsistent behaviour in a park.

  • Playhouse is not rendered.
  • While playground and picknick-table are.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.16277/4.47963

@HolgerJeromin
Copy link
Contributor

HolgerJeromin commented May 17, 2023

I asume you mean this node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10905248295

playground=playhouse
We discussed playground equipment in: #3161

@BertMule
Copy link
Author

BertMule commented May 18, 2023

Indeed, that is: a couple around there.

I had not found the other issue/pull-request.
See my remark there.

@imagico
Copy link
Collaborator

imagico commented May 22, 2023

Closing this as the specific request to selectively render playground=playhouse is not going to find support here.

#3161 was closed with the decision not to render playground details. We could revisit that decision in light of how widely these are meanwhile mapped (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/playground#overview) and how meaningful these can be for a significant part of our target users base (kids and families with kids) and that we have an increasing interest in developing the high zoom levels (#4661).

For this to actually have a chance (in particular in light of #3635) a concrete and viable design concept would be needed. Just dumping a number of additional POI symbols into the system - like #3161 attempted - is not likely going to find approval. What is necessary here is some solid, holistic design work with outside-the-box thinking (compare for example also #844). Anyone who wants to work on that should feel welcome to open a new issue. And for those who want to contribute but do not have the design skills - working on #3880 would help a lot here as well.

@imagico imagico closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale May 22, 2023
@BertMule
Copy link
Author

BertMule commented May 22, 2023

For clarity.
I don't suggest to distinguish and depict all sorts of playing-objects. That's too much detail.
Just that both a playground (area) and any play-object (point) are depicted.
The latter in a generic way. That's how I interpreted it to start with.
And I thought to have seen it that way. Has that changed?

@imagico
Copy link
Collaborator

imagico commented May 22, 2023

We are rendering (and have rendered since version 1.0) leisure=playground on points and polygons:

https://imagico.de/map/styleinfo/#style=osmcarto&section=tags&key=leisure&value=playground
https://imagico.de/map/styleinfo/#style=osmcv1&section=tags&key=leisure&value=playground

We have never rendered any playground=* features so far.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants