You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think for the future of this crate,it would be good to split it into multiple crates. Part of the sub crates will be a schema registry cliënt.
The base should/could be created based on the open api spec available. I'm considering doing so in a version 4 release, as there likely are breaking changes. The whole crate would be a lot simpler if I only conciser async. However, I can't see which features are enabled when this crate is used. Therefore, please let me know if the blocking variant should stay.
I only use this crate async, and don't think it's needed to have a blocking feature.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I think for the future of this crate,it would be good to split it into multiple crates. Part of the sub crates will be a schema registry cliënt.
The base should/could be created based on the open api spec available. I'm considering doing so in a version 4 release, as there likely are breaking changes. The whole crate would be a lot simpler if I only conciser async. However, I can't see which features are enabled when this crate is used. Therefore, please let me know if the blocking variant should stay.
2 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions