Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate with fedocal to better classify meetings #102

Open
bexelbie opened this issue Sep 29, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Integrate with fedocal to better classify meetings #102

bexelbie opened this issue Sep 29, 2016 · 2 comments
Labels
D: research Research and more data is needed to make a decision T: new change Adds new capabilities or functionality

Comments

@bexelbie
Copy link

Fedocal lists when meetings are scheduled. If mote was aware of the fedocal schedule it could make a fairly educated guess about what group the meeting was for. This would allow for better search for meetings as you wouldn't have so many similar group names littering the name space.

@cydrobolt
Copy link
Contributor

Although it would be possible to integrate with Fedocal, are all meetings available within Fedocal? How complete is the data?

It sounds like you're suggesting that we scrap the current naming system in favour of names matched from Fedocal. mote handles archive data dating back many years; I'm not sure how smooth the data would be if we substituted the current naming conventions with Fedocal data.

We're currently looking into developing some kind of alias system that could alias different groups into one category for viewing on mote, but I have been busy and haven't been able to work on it recently. Perhaps that's a better idea for backwards compatibility and more reliable data going forward. Ensure that meeting chairs are aware of how to correctly set the meeting name so that there aren't different group names for the same group.

@bexelbie
Copy link
Author

@cydrobolt

It sounds like you're suggesting that we scrap the current naming system in favour of names matched from Fedocal. mote handles archive data dating back many years; I'm not sure how smooth the data would be if we substituted the current naming conventions with Fedocal data.

I do not want to see the current naming system scrapped and I think aliases sound like a good idea. I am suggesting that using fedocal will add one more piece of metadata for some meetings and could make building things like the browse page easier.

@jwflory jwflory added D: research Research and more data is needed to make a decision T: new change Adds new capabilities or functionality labels Oct 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
D: research Research and more data is needed to make a decision T: new change Adds new capabilities or functionality
Projects
No open projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants