-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Shift e2e processing into a webworker #2503
Comments
Yes it should, but that will mean asynchronous decryption of events, which will probably mean hooks up to the react layer. |
now the whole API is async thanks to indexeddb, does this become easier? Or have we even got it for free? |
Since this has become the blocker issue for #26231 (which is a paying-customer facing usability regression), I'd like to understand what the status of this issue is, and whether we are "close" in temporal terms. |
@marcusmueller I'm afraid it's unlikely to be a priority within the next few weeks. |
Now, I understand that weeks are short. I feel like I'm touting my own horn here a bit hard, but if this change does not end up being a priority at some point in the medium future, that'd be a bit sad: |
It's 7+ months later and this is still an issue. In my use case, I am NOT using E2E because encryption in my org is against policy. Is there a way I can have multiple tabs (rooms) open at the same time since E2E is disabled? #26231 links here. |
We shouldn't be locking up the UI when encrypting/decrypting E2E; shouldn't this be in a bg worker?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: