Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid redundancy of semantic labels? #111

Open
judithek opened this issue May 6, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Avoid redundancy of semantic labels? #111

judithek opened this issue May 6, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@judithek
Copy link
Member

judithek commented May 6, 2015

In UBY-WordNet, domain labels are stored at three positions:
* as part of the gloss (Definition.TextRepresentation) as a bracketed prefix
* as a SemanticLabel
* as a SenseRelation of type topic

Discuss if the redundancy is necessary. Keep in mind that WordNet users might want
the bracketed prefix in order to reproduce results of the original WordNet. Same applies
to some extent to SenseRelation...

Original issue reported on code.google.com by chmeyer.de on 2014-10-09 09:20:06

@judithek
Copy link
Member Author

judithek commented May 6, 2015

I would keep the redundancy because
1) it is created automatically (and thus consistently) - Uby is read-only
2) applications might depend on one of the 3 variants
3) we claim that one of our main goals is to preserve the information present in the
original resources

Original issue reported on code.google.com by eckle.kohler on 2014-10-09 18:18:08

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant