You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Vocabularies defining properties of RDF type rdf:Property don't appear in the generated HTML list of properties (i.e., only property terms typed as owl:ObjectProperty appear). I'm not sure if this might require an update to LODE (hopefully not!).
Describe the solution you'd like
Vocabularies defining properties of RDF type rdf:Property appear in the generated HTML list of properties.
Describe alternatives you've considered
If you control a vocabulary, you can manually add owl:ObjectProperty types to your properties, but this seems a bit unwieldy if you don't use OWL much at all, and can't be done for vocabs you don't control.
Additional context
Allows Widoco document simple vocabs based only on RDF and RDFS (and not necessarily using OWL at all).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
pmcb55
changed the title
Can vocab terms of type rdf:Property be easily added to generated HTML property list?
Can vocab terms of type rdf:Property be easily included in the generated HTML property list?
Sep 20, 2021
Hi @pmcb55,
I tried a while back to add full support for schema.org vocabs (see #449), but it didn't work out pretty well, and it needs more digging. Unfortunately all this always requires modifying the LODE template, which is not very maintainable
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Vocabularies defining properties of RDF type
rdf:Property
don't appear in the generated HTML list of properties (i.e., only property terms typed asowl:ObjectProperty
appear). I'm not sure if this might require an update to LODE (hopefully not!).Describe the solution you'd like
Vocabularies defining properties of RDF type
rdf:Property
appear in the generated HTML list of properties.Describe alternatives you've considered
If you control a vocabulary, you can manually add
owl:ObjectProperty
types to your properties, but this seems a bit unwieldy if you don't use OWL much at all, and can't be done for vocabs you don't control.Additional context
Allows Widoco document simple vocabs based only on RDF and RDFS (and not necessarily using OWL at all).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: