-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
why another PEAR channel? :) #3
Comments
I actually don't know much about the PEAR channel servers - are there specific implementations to look at? |
Pirum is something fresh: http://www.pirum-project.org/ More complex(with database backend) and mature: Chiara_PEAR_Server, here is howto: |
because pear packages are only installed once per server. drupal packages can be installed multiple times for multiple drupal releases for multiple sites for multiple profiles. and there can be multiple simultanuous conflicting versions installed with multiple levels of visibility. and we needed compatibility with the existing drupal.org architecture which is not under our direct control. basically, if all drupal modules/themes were pear packages, we could re-use the pear server architecture, but that is not the case and it is out of our hands. |
I thought the same for a while, but
here you wrong, it's can be initiated as much as you like, for example it can be server wide packages installed as well as local(user or even project(see magento), i.e. platform/profile in case of drupal)
That's right, probably the wrong place to start such discussion, I'll continue at drupal.org, drush_make, etc. but I think the "problem" affecting both client and server developers and must be discussed collaboratively :) |
Hello,
as far I see the feature server and pear channel having very close aim, but however the PEAR and it's channel server a bit more famous in php world(at least for me, because used it even before drupal) and have a some successful integration examples in others projects like Symfony or Magento I am curious is it were on radar when development of feature server began and why it's were not chosen?
I might be wrong, but would like to hear something back if it's so :)
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: