Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(query): add fuzz tests #17100

Draft
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

sundy-li
Copy link
Member

@sundy-li sundy-li commented Dec 23, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

  1. add min_string_len,max_string_len, max_array_len options in random engine
  2. add fuzz aggregate、union tests
  3. fix union projection

fixes #17096

Tests

  • Unit Test
  • Logic Test
  • Benchmark Test
  • No Test - Explain why

Type of change

  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking Change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality not to work as expected)
  • Documentation Update
  • Refactoring
  • Performance Improvement
  • Other (please describe):

This change is Reviewable

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pr-chore this PR only has small changes that no need to record, like coding styles. label Dec 23, 2024
@sundy-li sundy-li requested review from zhyass, b41sh and Dousir9 December 23, 2024 09:35
@sundy-li sundy-li marked this pull request as ready for review December 24, 2024 07:48
@sundy-li sundy-li changed the title chore(query): add fuzz aggregate tests chore(query): add fuzz tests Dec 24, 2024
@sundy-li sundy-li marked this pull request as draft December 25, 2024 03:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr-chore this PR only has small changes that no need to record, like coding styles.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: union all get wrong result
1 participant