You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Actual:
Actual implementation do the image cleanup only on the node running the shepherd container, not on the node running the service updated, nor on any other
Expected:
In decreasing preference order:
Cleanup on every nodes, keeping the image digest matching the updated image (rem: image digest is immutable not the image ID)
Cleanup on every nodes
Cleanup on node running the service
Limitation highlighted in documentation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry for the late answer. Personally I think the integrated image cleanup was the wrong way to go. I propose to run docker system prune regularly on every docker node. That should solve all the problems. What do you think?
Hi thanks for reply. Yes this could do. Assuming this would force to have an agent on each cluster node as done by portainer. This local agent could then also help taking decision for smarter update trigger.
Agent.. Well.. Or keep it easy and add it as a cron job. (Unfortunately, swarm-cronjob does not reliably run global mode services, otherwise I would recommend that.)
Actual:
Actual implementation do the image cleanup only on the node running the shepherd container, not on the node running the service updated, nor on any other
Expected:
In decreasing preference order:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: