Worth updating methods signatures from T to Target?

[roman-mibex-2]

When I auto complete to override an existing target, the the IDE (IntelliJ) will use T[ReturnType].

However, these are aliases to full named types since 0.12 and those are used in the introduction chapters.
So, my question is it worth to update these signatures so that auto complete gives types matching the docs? Or will that cause some strange issue and and thats why it was kept as the T alias?

If it doesn't cause issues and its something worth doing then I can certainly do some of that busy work.

Sub questions:

• Is 'Target' or 'Task' preferred. Both exist?

[roman-mibex-2]

Oh, it probably breaks compatability with 0.11 plugins, because those refer to mill.T? I'm not familiar enough with Scala API comparability.

[lihaoyi]

Currently the recommended type signature is T[_]. For now it is an alias for Target[_], but I expect in 0.13.0 to make it an alias for Task[_], but using T[_] is probably the most future proof

[roman-mibex-2]

Conclusion: No renaming for now to be on the safe side.
At least for 0.12.x.
For 0.13.x maybe more possible, but maybe adds more churn than helping.