You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@nate-double-u and I had the discussion at some point: why are we numbering project analysis folder/files? It's probably historical. I'd suggest that we adopt the "blog" convention of putting analyses into folders named by the year that the analysis is started and/or published. WDYT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I always thought that starting the numbering with 3 leading zeros was very optimistic 😅
I'd be fine with dropping the numbering system and adopting a blog-style organization that you suggest. Putting a table of contents style section in the techdocs/analyses/README.md would also help with findability.
@nate-double-u and I had the discussion at some point: why are we numbering project analysis folder/files? It's probably historical. I'd suggest that we adopt the "blog" convention of putting analyses into folders named by the year that the analysis is started and/or published. WDYT?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: