Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect LicenseRef-scancode being used #1259

Open
ariel11 opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Incorrect LicenseRef-scancode being used #1259

ariel11 opened this issue Dec 16, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@ariel11
Copy link

ariel11 commented Dec 16, 2024

ClearlyDefined picked an incorrect License Ref ID for this component - https://clearlydefined.io/definitions/npm/npmjs/@ag-grid-enterprise/status-bar/30.2.1/30.2.1.

I don't think another company’s EULA should get “LicenseRef-scancode-warranty-disclaimer,” which is described as a “catch all license” often used by Microsoft in its source code.

image

However, there does not appear to be a License Ref for the AG GRID ENTERPRISE EULA. How can I nominate that for a LicenseRef-scancode ID?

Also, I hope ClearlyDefined is not defaulting to the closest LicenseRef-scancode ID it thinks it has? If there's not a match, ClearlyDefined should still put NOASSERTION, correct?

@ariel11
Copy link
Author

ariel11 commented Dec 16, 2024

@elrayle - FYI. Thank you!

@capfei and @AE49 - FYI

@elrayle
Copy link
Collaborator

elrayle commented Dec 17, 2024

@ariel11 For questions or improvements to the licenses coming from ScanCode, you can see your options for support in the scancode-licensedb support page.

Screen shot here for reference. If you go to the support page, there are links.

scancode support

@ariel11
Copy link
Author

ariel11 commented Dec 17, 2024

Thanks for the pointer @elrayle on where to propose new scancode license refs. To confirm - I think this is the correct location for the first part of this issue, correct? --> ClearlyDefined selecting an incorrect scancode license ref?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants