Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I think that operator overloading severely harms the clarity of most languages that have it. Given that C3 already has functions that can be called on structs using the dot (".") operator, I think that this would be a misfeature and a negative change. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Specialized operator overloading is sometimes very convenient and makes code far easier to read. Thinking mostly about [] overloading for vectors and maps. m["Hello"] = 5 looks nicer to write and read than m.put("Hello", 5); |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Polls testing
17 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions