You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As reported by @rzach in vlmantova/bookml#11, when using \usepackage[cal=boondoxo]{mathalfa}, LaTeXML should redefine \mathcal as an alias for \mathscr. As of now, it annotates the output of \mathcal with the class ltx_math_caligraphic and so BookML ends up using the wrong font.
This will become marginally more serious if you merge #2244, as the characters themselves will get the wrong Unicode variation selector, and so browsers and MathJax will show the wrong glyphs (if and when UVSs get implemented more widely).
I suppose there may be other packages where \mathcal is actually roundhand and need a similar treatment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As reported by @rzach in vlmantova/bookml#11, when using
\usepackage[cal=boondoxo]{mathalfa}
, LaTeXML should redefine\mathcal
as an alias for\mathscr
. As of now, it annotates the output of\mathcal
with the classltx_math_caligraphic
and so BookML ends up using the wrong font.This will become marginally more serious if you merge #2244, as the characters themselves will get the wrong Unicode variation selector, and so browsers and MathJax will show the wrong glyphs (if and when UVSs get implemented more widely).
I suppose there may be other packages where
\mathcal
is actually roundhand and need a similar treatment.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: