You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for your efforts in developing this resource - it is a very sound concept. I have been wondering why after checking back here every so often I have not yet seen any immediately obvious indication of "upgrade" plans to Titan 1.0 and the TinkerPop 3.1.x line, which have a significant number of new and improved features and integration points - am I missing something or is it just a really big job with limited benefit?
Cheers,
Dylan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I guess, updating the code isn't very hard, but importing the whole thing (because Titan 1.0 is not storage-compatible with 0.5) is quite a big effort at the moment, because it's a manual process and takes a lot of time.
And about getting TinkerPop 3 support it's not a priority for us, because we don't use it: there is a solid Java API for interacting with Bio4j, which takes into account specifics of the DB schema, and we are also working on the Scala API.
So as you said it's a "big job with limited benefit", while we are a small team and have a lot of other projects to maintain at the same time. But if you have enthusiasm to do at least some of this work, it would be very helpful 😉
Hi Guys,
Thanks for your efforts in developing this resource - it is a very sound concept. I have been wondering why after checking back here every so often I have not yet seen any immediately obvious indication of "upgrade" plans to Titan 1.0 and the TinkerPop 3.1.x line, which have a significant number of new and improved features and integration points - am I missing something or is it just a really big job with limited benefit?
Cheers,
Dylan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: