Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: always allow schema string examples #1007

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

timonback
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The spectral rule asyncApi2SchemaValidation currently enforces that all examples have the same type as the schema type. However, we believe that there are cases in AsyncAPI, where it is needed to accept string examples regardless of the schema type.

To Reproduce:

  1. Use the AsyncAPI document: Allow plain string in Message Example Object field payload for non-json payloads (like xml, yaml) spec#1038 (comment)
  2. Open it in AsyncAPI studio
  3. See the error: 66:11 error asyncapi-schema-examples "0" property type must be object components.schemas.io.github.springwolf.examples.kafka.dtos.XmlPayloadDto.examples[0]

Related issue(s)

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for creating your first pull request. Please check out our contributors guide useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 7, 2024

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity 😴

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this pull request, add a comment with detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific pull request has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this pull request forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience ❤️

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Nov 1, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 8cc8c6a

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@timonback
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bump.

To resolve #997 (comment)

Aligns with spectral parser, where the change has been merged via stoplightio/spectral#2625 (comment) and was approved by @jonaslagoni

Copy link
Member

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just some linting problems ✌️

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Nov 1, 2024

@timonback
Copy link
Contributor Author

timonback commented Nov 1, 2024

Just some linting problems ✌️

PR is updated

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

/rtm

Copy link
Member

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As the new setup, you need to add a changeset otherwise no release I dont think😓 #1007 (comment)

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Nov 2, 2024
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Copy link
Member

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just merging it, at some point a change request will be added 🤷

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni merged commit 8710f53 into asyncapi:master Dec 4, 2024
11 checks passed
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.2.3 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants