You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wonder if the METSDocument itself wouldn't be a nicer abstraction to be passing around functions such as this when using this utility?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ross-spencer
changed the title
Problem: Tree required as an arg to validate functions when MetsDocument would be a nicer abstraction
Problem: Tree or serialize() required as an arg to validate functions when MetsDocument would be a nicer abstraction
Apr 4, 2018
ross-spencer
changed the title
Problem: Tree or serialize() required as an arg to validate functions when MetsDocument would be a nicer abstraction
Problem: Tree or serialize() required as an arg to validate functions when METSDocument would be a nicer abstraction
Apr 4, 2018
Here, and a few other places we're asked to pass a
.tree
argument asmets_doc
, in this case, to validate the document:I wonder if the METSDocument itself wouldn't be a nicer abstraction to be passing around functions such as this when using this utility?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: