Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allo 2.1 wishlist #544

Open
owocki opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Allo 2.1 wishlist #544

owocki opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@owocki
Copy link
Contributor

owocki commented Apr 15, 2024

Kevins List

  1. remove the paternalizing requirement that allo team "approves" every strategy.
  2. add infra for pub/sub
  3. invest in polymorphism
  4. offchain voting/metatransactions
  5. good starter kit. it should be < 3 mins to get a hello world up and running.
  6. make as many dependancies as possible ( like LIT , allo registry ) optional

Carls List

  1. minimal core contracts similar to the simplicity of erc20 and erc721. Just the minimal interface. Work on an EIP to rally the community towards a shared standard. This could unlock new applications similar to what Uniswap and Aave did with erc20. Imagine what OpenZeppelin would implement from these standards if they were to, what kinds of presets?
  2. permissionless to deploy similar to OpenZeppelin
  3. audited utility libraries for QF math and commonly used functionality
  4. composability (easily combine qv allocation with drips for example)
  5. Remove registry and allo dependencies on Strategy contracts
  6. I've put together a doc here with several examples of what contracts could look like
    1. https://hackmd.io/@carlb/ByE1s_xpp

Adityas List

Mo’s List

  • Review and reorder all events to be indexer friendly
  • Move Grants Stack’s Allo interface into its own separate package or inside allo sdk
  • Rename Indexer’s tables to match Allo SDK (rounds => pools, projects => profiles etc.)
@owocki
Copy link
Contributor Author

owocki commented Jul 16, 2024

id love to understand how we are ordering the items in the OP through the project board. seems that only a subset is on there rn.

which ones are going to be ready by devcon, current course and speed?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
@owocki and others