Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CA legs don't refer to aircraft perf. #1214

Open
6639835 opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

CA legs don't refer to aircraft perf. #1214

6639835 opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement requested reschedule Assign to one of the milestones

Comments

@6639835
Copy link

6639835 commented Dec 17, 2024

Hello guys. The latest version of LNM. If CA FA legs will combine aircraft performance to decide the distance would be wonderful. So that "C172" won't get the same distance as "A320". That's really important tho.

@albar965
Copy link
Owner

Unfortunately only one guy. 🙃

This is not doable with the current aircraft performance. I'd have to collect aircraft performance for low altitude separately.
Maybe in a (far) future release.

@albar965 albar965 self-assigned this Dec 17, 2024
@albar965 albar965 added enhancement requested reschedule Assign to one of the milestones labels Dec 17, 2024
@6639835
Copy link
Author

6639835 commented Dec 17, 2024

Unfortunately only one guy. 🙃

This is not doable with the current aircraft performance. I'd have to collect aircraft performance for low altitude separately. Maybe in a (far) future release.

Nice!! BTW: Is that possible to add data in the aircraft perf file?

@albar965
Copy link
Owner

Nice!! BTW: Is that possible to add data in the aircraft perf file?

I have to see. Things are getting really complicated here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement requested reschedule Assign to one of the milestones
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants