Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accuracy only about 27% on CIFAR-100 #5

Open
songzhaozhe opened this issue Dec 1, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Accuracy only about 27% on CIFAR-100 #5

songzhaozhe opened this issue Dec 1, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@songzhaozhe
Copy link

songzhaozhe commented Dec 1, 2017

Hi,

I like the idea very much, but I am wondering how this work is going since there have been no updates for 4 months.

I ran the 3 instructions twice mentioned in the readme, and achieved only 27.2% and 26.5% val error on CIFAR-100, substantially higher than the paper.

Is this because the default setting is incorrect, or the variance is huge due to randomness?

Thank you!

@rainfalj
Copy link

rainfalj commented Dec 3, 2017

My train on cifar10 just could not reach 4.03%, I use test data and big op

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants