We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi,
I like the idea very much, but I am wondering how this work is going since there have been no updates for 4 months.
I ran the 3 instructions twice mentioned in the readme, and achieved only 27.2% and 26.5% val error on CIFAR-100, substantially higher than the paper.
Is this because the default setting is incorrect, or the variance is huge due to randomness?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My train on cifar10 just could not reach 4.03%, I use test data and big op
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
I like the idea very much, but I am wondering how this work is going since there have been no updates for 4 months.
I ran the 3 instructions twice mentioned in the readme, and achieved only 27.2% and 26.5% val error on CIFAR-100, substantially higher than the paper.
Is this because the default setting is incorrect, or the variance is huge due to randomness?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: