You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to RFC2919 the part (up to the first .) that is used by the filter to create a tag is named list-label. Is there any technical reason (e.g. notmuch limitation) for not using the full list-id i.e. the text between < and >?
I am asking because I just turned it on and found out that I've got message form several lists named dev tagged together as lists/dev, which doesn't make sense.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
classListMailsFilter(HeaderMatchingFilter):
message='Tagging mailing list posts'query='NOT tag:lists'pattern=r"<(?P<list_id>[a-z0-9!#$%&'*+/=?^_`{|}~-]+)\."header='List-Id'tags= ['+lists', '+lists/{list_id}']
You can see it adds 2 tags (lists, lists/mylist).
I am asking because I just turned it on and found out that I've got message form several lists named dev tagged together as lists/dev, which doesn't make sense.
I have some like that too, in those case if I want to tag them out nicely,
I'll use the filter module like so (documentation: configuration and filters) (I think the filter documentation need a good upgrade)
According to RFC2919 the part (up to the first
.
) that is used by the filter to create a tag is named list-label. Is there any technical reason (e.g. notmuch limitation) for not using the full list-id i.e. the text between<
and>
?I am asking because I just turned it on and found out that I've got message form several lists named
dev
tagged together aslists/dev
, which doesn't make sense.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: