Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is the component's provider trustworthy? #44

Open
Kr0nox opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Is the component's provider trustworthy? #44

Kr0nox opened this issue Jan 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
accepted Uncertainty was manually verified and entered into the archive

Comments

@Kr0nox
Copy link
Collaborator

Kr0nox commented Jan 29, 2024

Is the component's provider trustworthy?

Description

Uncertainties surface regarding the trustworthiness of software component providers, raising concerns about the reliability, security, and ethical considerations associated with third-party components.

Literature Reference

Classifications

Category Option
Location Environment
Architectural Element Type Component
Type Scenario Uncertainty
Manageability Partially Reducible
Resolution Time Runtime
Reducible by ADD Yes
Impact on Confidentiality Direct
Severity of the Impact High

Keywords

Component, Trust

Example

In a cloud-based system, questions arise about whether a data storage service from a specific provider can be trusted, e.g., with relation to third parties.

Related Uncertainties

Parent:

#76

Related Uncertainties:

#42, #43, #61, #48
@Kr0nox Kr0nox added the proposal A proposed uncertainty that was not yet verified and added to the archive label Jan 29, 2024
@sebinside sebinside added accepted Uncertainty was manually verified and entered into the archive and removed proposal A proposed uncertainty that was not yet verified and added to the archive labels Feb 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted Uncertainty was manually verified and entered into the archive
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants