You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
Thanks for this promising work! I am reproducing the results from your paper using the provided configuration. I noticed a difference between how Equation (10) is implemented in the code and how it is defined. Considering the similarity condition between different centroids, Equation (10) uses larger ACD clusters while the code uses smaller ACD clusters. Could you clarify if there is a specific reason for this difference or guide me to the correct implementation?
Thanks for your help.
if (abs((current_centriod_distance-max_centriod_distance[0]).item()) <0.1*current_centriod_distance.item() and (sample_num_list[class_num] <sample_num_list[max_centriod_indice[0].item()])):
Hello,
Thanks for this promising work! I am reproducing the results from your paper using the provided configuration. I noticed a difference between how Equation (10) is implemented in the code and how it is defined. Considering the similarity condition between different centroids, Equation (10) uses larger ACD clusters while the code uses smaller ACD clusters. Could you clarify if there is a specific reason for this difference or guide me to the correct implementation?
Thanks for your help.
TABASCO/experiment/train_cifar_ssl.py
Lines 361 to 369 in 712992b
TABASCO/experiment/train_cifar_ssl.py
Lines 342 to 347 in 712992b
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: