useExternalResource versus ExternalResource

[jberdine]

It is potentially confusing that we have a useExternalResource function that does not necessarily have anything to do with the ExternalResource type, but instead works with ExternalServices.

[jberdine]

Maybe it is ok. If useExternalResource is used for a service defined with a GenericExternalService, then an ExternalResource might indeed have been used. On the other hand if useExternalResource is used for a service defined with a SkipExternalService, then there is no ExternalResource involved.

Curious if @bennostein, @beauby, or @pikatchu have opinions.

[bennostein]

for a service defined with a SkipExternalService, then there is no ExternalResource involved.

Indeed there is no ExternalResource but there is an "external resource", i.e. a Resource belonging to the external skip service. I agree it's not perfect, but I can't think of a better name atm...