You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have listed below a high order proposal of what I think is missing for the paper and tentatively suggesting who I think could be responsible for each of the bits. Especially within Neurogears, of course you decide if this task allocation make sense and how to allocate tasks between you guys. This is just a proposal.
In the interest of not adding extra meetings for this, I would propose to turn task control into a paper meeting (basically to track progress on the first part below), and data architecture into a documentation meeting, so DJ will also be there in case we need their input. This just until the deadline. We should agree together on which one of the things below are actually doable and on realistic deadlines for them. I would suggest as a overall deadline to submit the preprint December 15th. I have divided the tasks in 3 main cathegories: PAPER, DOCUMENTATION, DATA
for 24/7 foraging figure check tracking from Tom/Andre and Zimo. @Dario55 If needed I would need help from @aspaNeuro@NeuroThom to retrack.
Generate social figures. Replicate what’s done for poster with more mice plus few extra analysis discussed for cosyne poster (let’s see what we have and then we decide where to draw the line between this and social paper). @jkbhagatio
look at foraging efficiency conditional on dominance @jkbhagatio
in general we need to make sure of data integrity and quality: for at least 6 pairs (very minimum to do any statistic) we need to have high quality tracking and identity, tube test before and after social. @jkbhagatio
make sure that effect we saw like similar patch occupancy or high coforaging rate are real and not due to if tracking artefacts. @jkbhagatio
make sure that database has all the data we need @jkbhagatio
rerun and check dominance based on corridors encounteres for all 6 pairs @jkbhagatio@anayapouget
decide whether we want to also use fighting/fast chasing as a metric for dominance or not. @jkbhagatio@anayapouget
fix rfid readings that in the poster where all over the places. Maybe this will sort itself when fixing the tracking @jkbhagatio
Get quantification of model prediction accuracy for few mice (ideally the six pairs) to show that model work. At the moment we have only one example @jkbhagatio@anayapouget@lochhh
DOCUMENTATION
Svenja will present the full and detailed plan for documentation/website soon, Here I just want to give an overview so people can have an idea of how much involvement we are hoping to have from each team member. We would need help from everyone . I have tentatively put some names here and there of who I think knows the relevant information for each step, but please feel free to edit. @snierwetberg will be overseeing and working on all aspects of the docs/website, so I haven’t written her name every time.
How to start an experiment: all the steps required to run an experiment front to end (check list). @lorycalca , @jkbhagatio , @aspaNeuro
DATA
If we are going to share data, we need to:
document the data structure. This can be done in the form of a DJ database, raw data or both.
document the experiments done, the mice, etc. We can use one of the social for this to start with, and then go back to previous experiments. @jkbhagatio, @glopesdev.
if we are sharing a big proportion of the data we need to ensure data quality, compliance with the rules if we show videos.@jkbhagatio, @glopesdev,@Dario55, @lorycalca
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I have listed below a high order proposal of what I think is missing for the paper and tentatively suggesting who I think could be responsible for each of the bits. Especially within Neurogears, of course you decide if this task allocation make sense and how to allocate tasks between you guys. This is just a proposal.
In the interest of not adding extra meetings for this, I would propose to turn task control into a paper meeting (basically to track progress on the first part below), and data architecture into a documentation meeting, so DJ will also be there in case we need their input. This just until the deadline. We should agree together on which one of the things below are actually doable and on realistic deadlines for them. I would suggest as a overall deadline to submit the preprint December 15th. I have divided the tasks in 3 main cathegories: PAPER, DOCUMENTATION, DATA
Please feel free to edit comment as appropiate
PAPER (deadline: 15.12.2024)
DOCUMENTATION
Svenja will present the full and detailed plan for documentation/website soon, Here I just want to give an overview so people can have an idea of how much involvement we are hoping to have from each team member. We would need help from everyone . I have tentatively put some names here and there of who I think knows the relevant information for each step, but please feel free to edit. @snierwetberg will be overseeing and working on all aspects of the docs/website, so I haven’t written her name every time.
DATA
If we are going to share data, we need to:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions