Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implementation of Logical and Physical Types of Data for Attributes #13

Open
Cyb3rWard0g opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Implementation of Logical and Physical Types of Data for Attributes #13

Cyb3rWard0g opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
@Cyb3rPandaH
Labels
feature structure

Comments

@Cyb3rWard0g
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Cyb3rPandaH Cyb3rPandaH changed the title [HOTFIX] Process IDs should be treated as strings and not integers Implementation of Physical and Logical Types of Data for every attribute Aug 8, 2021
@Cyb3rWard0g Cyb3rWard0g changed the title Implementation of Physical and Logical Types of Data for every attribute Process IDs should be treated as strings and not integers Aug 8, 2021
@Cyb3rPandaH Cyb3rPandaH changed the title Process IDs should be treated as strings and not integers Implementation of Logical and Physical Types of Data for Attributes Aug 8, 2021
@Cyb3rPandaH
Copy link
Contributor

  • We are currently mixing physical and logical types of data
  • Example: Process IDs should be treated as strings and not integers
  • Logical types do not apply for all attributes.

@Cyb3rPandaH Cyb3rPandaH self-assigned this Aug 8, 2021
@Cyb3rPandaH
Copy link
Contributor

We need to update this table: https://github.com/OTRF/OSSEM/blob/master/docs/cdm/guidelines/data_types.md

@Cyb3rWard0g
Copy link
Contributor Author

#12

@Cyb3rPandaH
Copy link
Contributor

Preview for review here: https://github.com/Cyb3rPandaH/OSSEM/blob/master/docs/cdm/guidelines/data_types.md

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Cyb3rPandaH Cyb3rPandaH

Labels
feature structure
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Cyb3rWard0g @Cyb3rPandaH