You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This Style Guide now provides some guidelines for the use of the OpenAPI name in the branding of projects, tools, and organizations outside the OAI itself, and the use of logos resembling the OpenAPI logo in such projects.
However, I had a hard time finding guidelines for appropriate usage of the OpenAPI logo itself.
It turns out that the usage guidelines seem to be in three different places:
That page looks like it might have been sourced from an earlier revision of this style guide.
I don't see a link from that page to this style guide project on GitHub, only to the logos. The page content includes a mention of "this repository," but the page appears outside of any repository.
That page is the only one that contains requirements for trademark symbols and attribution notices, which may be important to mention in any context that describes appropriate usage.
That page is also the only one that describes general guidelines for appropriate use of the OpenAPI logo.
It also contains a guideline for third-party usage that is expressed somewhat differently from the naming guidelines in this Style Guide:
Use is NOT acceptable if a company is stating, or implying, that OAS is a mark of an org besides the LF. For example, entities should ensure that their own product names and logos are larger than OAI/LF – OpenAPI Initiative and OpenAPI Specification should not be the most prominent name or logo on their materials.
There's quite a bit of overlap across these pages. There are likely some inconsistencies. They don't seem to be cross-linked in a methodical way. A person looking at any one of these pages probably won't know to look at the others to get the full picture. They would reasonably assume that the guidelines they see are complete and definitive.
I think we should look at this carefully and try to make it more DRY, so there's exactly one authoritative source for information about appropriate use of the OpenAPI names and logos, along with the related third-party branding guidelines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
tedepstein
changed the title
Allowed usage of the OpenAPI logo
Organize and consolidate guidelines for name & logo usage, attribution requirements, branding guidelines
Jul 28, 2018
tedepstein
changed the title
Organize and consolidate guidelines for name & logo usage, attribution requirements, branding guidelines
Organize and consolidate name & logo usage guidelines, 3rd-party branding guidelines
Jul 28, 2018
This Style Guide now provides some guidelines for the use of the OpenAPI name in the branding of projects, tools, and organizations outside the OAI itself, and the use of logos resembling the OpenAPI logo in such projects.
However, I had a hard time finding guidelines for appropriate usage of the OpenAPI logo itself.
It turns out that the usage guidelines seem to be in three different places:
There's quite a bit of overlap across these pages. There are likely some inconsistencies. They don't seem to be cross-linked in a methodical way. A person looking at any one of these pages probably won't know to look at the others to get the full picture. They would reasonably assume that the guidelines they see are complete and definitive.
I think we should look at this carefully and try to make it more DRY, so there's exactly one authoritative source for information about appropriate use of the OpenAPI names and logos, along with the related third-party branding guidelines.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: