Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optionally implement terraform-provider-jinja as provider-defined function(s) for Terraform 1.8+ #15

Open
crw opened this issue Mar 6, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@crw
Copy link

crw commented Mar 6, 2024

Thank you for supporting the Terraform community with this data provider! If you were using the data provider construct to work around the lack of support in Terraform for external functions, please consider the following new feature of Terraform.

Terraform version 1.8 launches with support of provider-defined functions. It is now possible to implement this functionality as a function, rather than wrap the functionality in a data provider. Provider-based functions have the advantage of a simpler in-line syntax that does not require the data block (or any other resource blocks) to use.

The caveat is that, as provider-defined functions are new to Terraform 1.8, you would need to continue to maintain the current data provider functionality if you wished to continue to support earlier versions of Terraform.

Please see the provider-defined functions documentation to learn how to implement functions in your providers. If you have any questions, please visit the Terraform topic in our official forum.

We greatly appreciate your support of the Terraform community with your contributions. If you do not wish to implement this functionality as a function, please feel free to close this issue. This issue is simply to raise awareness of the new capability. Thanks again!

@NikolaLohinski
Copy link
Owner

Hi @crw and thanks for the suggestion.

I'll keep the issue opened and see if I can give it a try some time.

Given the amount of possible configuration parameters, I don't think a function would look as clean as a data source block, but it could be a simplified helper function with some predefined options.

For anyone reading this and feeling motivated, I am happy to take PRs.

Cheers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants