Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

atomic threat coverage - new galaxies? #397

Open
adulau opened this issue May 9, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

atomic threat coverage - new galaxies? #397

adulau opened this issue May 9, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
S: stale Status: stale. This issue has had no activity in a long time, it may not be relevant anymore T: enhancement Type: enhancement. This issue is not a bug, it improves an existing feature

Comments

@adulau
Copy link
Member

adulau commented May 9, 2019

atomic threat coverage - https://github.com/krakow2600/atomic-threat-coverage

@adulau adulau added the T: enhancement Type: enhancement. This issue is not a bug, it improves an existing feature label May 9, 2019
@yugoslavskiy
Copy link

Hello @adulau !

We are about to split ATC to multiple modules and unify some of our entities with other project (OSSEM) which is doind kinda the same thing — documenting relevant data sources.
I believe that it make sense to discuss new MISP galaxies when we will finish this tasks and find final (more or less) structure for our analytics.

Will keep you updated!

@adulau
Copy link
Member Author

adulau commented Jun 26, 2019

Super! Let me know when it's ready and I'll have a look. Thanks a lot.

@enjeck enjeck added the S: stale Status: stale. This issue has had no activity in a long time, it may not be relevant anymore label Nov 18, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S: stale Status: stale. This issue has had no activity in a long time, it may not be relevant anymore T: enhancement Type: enhancement. This issue is not a bug, it improves an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants