You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking at the Compare_Mocks_theory notebook, there is a small residual mismatch between mocks and theory. I want to track this down and improve the match. I first need to make sure that the IA model really is the redshift independent NLA, without the [(z+1)/(z_0+1)]^(eta) term. Once that's verified, and that nothing else has become apparent, I might need to come up with an empirical calibration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looking at the Compare_Mocks_theory notebook, there is a small residual mismatch between mocks and theory. I want to track this down and improve the match. I first need to make sure that the IA model really is the redshift independent NLA, without the [(z+1)/(z_0+1)]^(eta) term. Once that's verified, and that nothing else has become apparent, I might need to come up with an empirical calibration.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: