You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the RNA degradation rate law is generated by
rl.equation = wc_lang.RateLawEquation(
expression='{0}[c] * (((k_cat * {1}) / (k_m + {1})) + {2})'.format(rna.id, deg_rnase.id(), '0.1'))
the result has the form "rna_tu_1_x[c] * (((k_cat * prot_gene_1_98[c]) / (k_m + prot_gene_1_98[c])) + 0.1)", for various values of '_x'. i suspect that the RNA should be treated as the substrate, and the RNAse (=prot_gene_1_98[c]) as the enzyme, which would be achieved by swapping them, but I'm not an expert in this area. the protein degradation is similar.
Arthur
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Great question.
This is a lumped law. Classically, RNA degradation is thought of as first
order in RNA. Because the copy numbers are small, I think it should be
first order in RNA. Then logistic in the RNA degradation machinery. This
differs from Michaelis-Menten. This is fine. The biochemistry of the
reaction is not the same as Michaelis-Menten chemistry. Thus, there is no
reason to expect the rate law would be the same.
The basal rate of degradation is fine. Keep in mind that with the basal
rate, k_cat will not be log(2)/t_{1/2}. Rather, the sum of the rates of all
mechanisms of RNA degradation should be consistent with the observed RNA
half life.
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018, 2:15 PM artgoldberg ***@***.***> wrote:
the RNA degradation rate law is generated by
rl.equation = wc_lang.RateLawEquation(
expression='{0}[c] * (((k_cat * {1}) / (k_m + {1})) + {2})'.format(rna.id,
deg_rnase.id(), '0.1'))
the result has the form "rna_tu_1_x[c] * (((k_cat * prot_gene_1_98[c]) /
(k_m + prot_gene_1_98[c])) + 0.1)", for various values of '_x'. i suspect
that the RNA should be treated as the substrate, and the RNAse
(=prot_gene_1_98[c]) as the enzyme, which would be achieved by swapping
them, but I'm not an expert in this area. the protein degradation is
similar.
Arthur
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACt2Kbi7FR3SgxARRHIUxnCyStoMgngnks5uUZQ8gaJpZM4WMe7i>
.
the RNA degradation rate law is generated by
rl.equation = wc_lang.RateLawEquation(
expression='{0}[c] * (((k_cat * {1}) / (k_m + {1})) + {2})'.format(rna.id, deg_rnase.id(), '0.1'))
the result has the form "rna_tu_1_x[c] * (((k_cat * prot_gene_1_98[c]) / (k_m + prot_gene_1_98[c])) + 0.1)", for various values of '_x'. i suspect that the RNA should be treated as the substrate, and the RNAse (=prot_gene_1_98[c]) as the enzyme, which would be achieved by swapping them, but I'm not an expert in this area. the protein degradation is similar.
Arthur
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: