Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Your experimental results are only accidental and not convincing #14

Open
giao-cloude opened this issue Jun 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@giao-cloude
Copy link

May I ask if you could disclose the composition of your training and validation sets? I suspect that you only used a clever method to achieve high accuracy, and changing the validation set would not achieve your experimental results

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant