Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MoistAir entropy and isentropicExponent issue #172

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RaphaelGebhart
Copy link
Contributor

Added assert(relativeHumidty<=1) to MoistAir.isentropicExponent and MoistAir.specificEntropy and added 3 Test Models for further discussion closes #169

…oistAir.specificEntropy and added 3 Test Models for further discussion
@RaphaelGebhart RaphaelGebhart requested a review from nieweber March 11, 2024 09:49
@RaphaelGebhart RaphaelGebhart marked this pull request as draft March 11, 2024 09:50
@RaphaelGebhart RaphaelGebhart self-assigned this Mar 11, 2024
@RaphaelGebhart RaphaelGebhart requested a review from dzimmer March 11, 2024 09:50
@dzimmer dzimmer marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2024 15:13
Copy link
Contributor

@dzimmer dzimmer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good for me by reading through it. I have to test the code though yet. No complaints so far.

@tobolar tobolar changed the title MoistAir entropy and isentropcExponent issue MoistAir entropy and isentropicExponent issue Jul 3, 2024
@RaphaelGebhart RaphaelGebhart requested a review from tobolar July 3, 2024 13:21
@RaphaelGebhart RaphaelGebhart marked this pull request as draft July 4, 2024 08:33
@dzimmer
Copy link
Contributor

dzimmer commented Jul 23, 2024

What is the reason for this being a draft? I would otherwise go on with the regression test

@RaphaelGebhart
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think jakub suggested the PR to be a draft, because i called the package "MoistAirDiscussion" and wrote "I assume" and "I suggest" in the docu, since im no expert in the media model but just noticed some issues at saturation where the media model retuns not reasonable results without warning the user, and maybe also since we said we might want to tell the MSL directly.

@tobolar tobolar removed their request for review October 21, 2024 10:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants