Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

You can change it when downloading to facilitate downloading again. #66

Closed
zjgmijg opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed
Assignees
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@zjgmijg
Copy link

zjgmijg commented Dec 11, 2023

image
When downloading, this can be made selectable and can be positioned with the mouse. In this way, enter can directly download again, which is very convenient.

As shown in the picture, the mouse can be positioned, so even if the card owner stops moving, I can enter and download directly.

@DJDoubleD
Copy link
Owner

I think you're trying to say that your download process sometimes stalls or "hangs" and you want to restart the download by resubmitting the download link (which is made read-only on purpose when a download task is running).
So I think that what you want is actually the same as #53.

Could you please confirm that I understood the problem correctly and you want to "cancel" a running download task that is stalled so you can restart it (in hopes that it won't stall anymore)?

@zjgmijg
Copy link
Author

zjgmijg commented Dec 12, 2023

Yes, click Cancel STOP and it should stop immediately.
Then I start the download to prevent the card owner from

@orbittwz
Copy link

The current download cannot stop immediately since it's in the program queue thread and connection tunnel...
When it's finished the program stops the download.
Do you have like a slow connection, and because of it you are asking for instant stop?
That's the way programs work with connections...

@DJDoubleD DJDoubleD added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label Dec 12, 2023
@DJDoubleD DJDoubleD self-assigned this Dec 12, 2023
@DJDoubleD
Copy link
Owner

I added the context of this issue to #53 and am closing this as a duplicate.
#53 will be used for future follow-up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants