You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While Credential Required CATs aren't commonplace as of yet, I think it might be pertinent to think about how more casual users may accidentally do things in a way that would cause issues.
One such problem appears that it is possible to send a CR-CAT direct to a wallet that does not have a valid credential to be able to spend it. While a solution may be that they simply GET a valid credential, it's entirely possible that the recipient would NEVER be able to get the required credential in order to spend that CAT (for instance, a CAT being sent to a non-US citizen who is either unable or unwilling to become a US citizen.) In this instance, the CR-CAT would essentially be bricked, which in the case of securities, would not be ideal.
Obviously, this is not to say users can't do what they want, however, I believe it should be prevented or at least heavily warned against in the Chia reference wallet if sending CR-CATs directly to a wallet address without a clawback. That way, at the very least, if the receiving wallet is unable to collect, it can be requested back from the sender.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
While Credential Required CATs aren't commonplace as of yet, I think it might be pertinent to think about how more casual users may accidentally do things in a way that would cause issues.
One such problem appears that it is possible to send a CR-CAT direct to a wallet that does not have a valid credential to be able to spend it. While a solution may be that they simply GET a valid credential, it's entirely possible that the recipient would NEVER be able to get the required credential in order to spend that CAT (for instance, a CAT being sent to a non-US citizen who is either unable or unwilling to become a US citizen.) In this instance, the CR-CAT would essentially be bricked, which in the case of securities, would not be ideal.
Obviously, this is not to say users can't do what they want, however, I believe it should be prevented or at least heavily warned against in the Chia reference wallet if sending CR-CATs directly to a wallet address without a clawback. That way, at the very least, if the receiving wallet is unable to collect, it can be requested back from the sender.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions