You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
May I suggest killing the temperature graph altogether? It's of limited use and has lots of bugs logged against it.
Since scrutiny logs to influxdb and it's trivial to connect that to grafana, you can make much more interesting widgets and graphs that way, based on the full range of attributes.
IMHO Scrutiny should focus on what it does best – logging SMART data, massaging it for human consumption, and presenting it in terms of Backblaze failure probability – but delegate fancy graphical representations of the data to projects that focus on that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
May I suggest killing the temperature graph altogether? It's of limited use and has lots of bugs logged against it.
Since scrutiny logs to influxdb and it's trivial to connect that to grafana, you can make much more interesting widgets and graphs that way, based on the full range of attributes.
IMHO Scrutiny should focus on what it does best – logging SMART data, massaging it for human consumption, and presenting it in terms of Backblaze failure probability – but delegate fancy graphical representations of the data to projects that focus on that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: