Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Foot error messages #86

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Dec 6, 2023

Conversation

neonWhiteout
Copy link
Collaborator

Foot and feet correctly throw errors, now, instead of needing an eval. Motivated by #80

…n quote blocks of the call, rather than directly calling the functions to create feet.

Removed testing code.
@neonWhiteout
Copy link
Collaborator Author

neonWhiteout commented Sep 6, 2023

if length(block.args) < 2 # case for create_foot(:())
                return error("Cannot create foot with no arguments.")

This would also trigger in the case where the expression has 1 argument, so something like :((A,)) would fail here

…error, since it's trying to call a match_foot_format on :C, where the function is only defined on expressions.)

removed testing code
@neonWhiteout
Copy link
Collaborator Author

You closed this without merging, should I change something here? @Xiaoyan-Li

@Xiaoyan-Li Xiaoyan-Li reopened this Sep 27, 2023
@Xiaoyan-Li
Copy link
Collaborator

You closed this without merging, should I change something here? @Xiaoyan-Li

Sorry, no, I just closed it accidentally. Reopen just now

@neonWhiteout
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ah boy give me a few min.

@neonWhiteout
Copy link
Collaborator Author

K throw this one in the trash for now.

@neonWhiteout neonWhiteout reopened this Sep 27, 2023
@neonWhiteout
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Passes tests on my end and shouldn't have any affect on the notebooks.

@neonWhiteout
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Nevermind it failed the notebook examples, need to figure out why...

@neonWhiteout
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@Saityi I don't know why this is failing the notebooks, seems like they fail to install IJulia and Conda? Any ideas?

@neonWhiteout neonWhiteout reopened this Sep 30, 2023
@neonWhiteout
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fails notebook tests, but I think there's something screwed up with them

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (781a54a) 49.93% compared to head (e82fa18) 50.03%.
Report is 16 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #86      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   49.93%   50.03%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        1524     1525       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          761      763       +2     
+ Misses        763      762       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Xiaoyan-Li Xiaoyan-Li merged commit 7e413bb into AlgebraicJulia:master Dec 6, 2023
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants