You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Jacoco offline instrumentation modifies the generated bundle and its underlying manifest, leading potentially to false-positives with aemanalyze-maven-plugin and potentially other exceptions during the build (ClassNotFoundExceptions....). It has been introduced with 7cb5929 to ensure compatibility with PowerMocks (#1321). However this library is no longer used, therefore this workaround for coverage calculation is no longer necessary.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It incorrectly affects manifest calculation which leads to follow-up
issues with aemanalyser-m-p and is generally not recommended
(https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/trunk/doc/instrument-mojo.html)
It was originally introduced for compatibility with PowerMock but that
is no longer used.
This closes#3494
kwin
linked a pull request
Dec 16, 2024
that will
close
this issue
It incorrectly affects manifest calculation which leads to follow-up
issues with aemanalyser-m-p and is generally not recommended
(https://www.eclemma.org/jacoco/trunk/doc/instrument-mojo.html)
It was originally introduced for compatibility with PowerMock but that
is no longer used.
Properly merge coverage from both UTs/ITs.
This closes#3494
The Jacoco offline instrumentation modifies the generated bundle and its underlying manifest, leading potentially to false-positives with aemanalyze-maven-plugin and potentially other exceptions during the build (
ClassNotFoundExceptions....
). It has been introduced with 7cb5929 to ensure compatibility with PowerMocks (#1321). However this library is no longer used, therefore this workaround for coverage calculation is no longer necessary.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: